No need to travel to private tutoring centers or register in costly online sites to get your education materials. The videos in this site are chosen to be best available resources in the internet for your studies. You can just use your home computer and internet connection, and you can navigate the websites under various tabs. Whether it's algebra, arithmetic, biology, calculus, chemistry, geometry, trigonometry or physics, we will try to include maximum available resources here.. Enjoy the best online free Education Site
HomeA Gentle Introduction to South Indian Classical Music: By Ramesh Mahadevan (Part IV of IV)
A GENTLE INTRODUCTION TO
SOUTH INDIAN CLASSICAL (KARNATIC)
THE CONCERT MUSICIAN
If you have ever been to a Karnatic concert, you would have noticed
that the ensemble sitting on the stage is usually only a few people strong. If
the main performer is a vocalist (let us assume this, for the time being !) he
is usually accompanied by a violinist and a Mridangam player. If he is lucky,
there is also a Ghatam player tapping on a clay pot for accompaniment. There
is, of course, a person strumming the Tanpura or the Sruti box and if the
musician is a senior artiste, some of his disciples too sit on the stage and
sing along - sometimes camouflaging the flaws of the Guru and reaching higher
notes their Gurus cannot reach.
It is always a dream of every student to become a performing musician and to
be top notch. But before being let loose on concert stages, they still have one
final plateau of excellence to reach - the ability to perform what is called a
'Ragam, Tanam, Pallavi' or RTP or simply 'Pallavi'. (Note again, how we use the
same word Pallavi to mean two different things) Ragam, Tanam, Pallavi is a
total elaboration of a specific Ragam and is one hundred percent improvisation
and creativity. It is the perfect place for a musician to show off his skill
and mastery in enunciating a Ragam. The Ragam, Tanam, Pallavi is in fact the
centerpiece of a Karnatic music concert.
First of, the musician chooses a 'strong' Ragam to perform his RTP.
Oftentimes he picks a Melakarta Ragam, where the scope to make creative
melodies is enormous (because they have all the allowed seven notes in the
scale - remember they are all Sampoorna or 'complete' Ragams) He would also
often choose a complex Talam to set his musical phrases in. Let us say he
chooses Shankarabharanam and set to a Talam with a eleven beat cycle (!). In
real concerts, usually the artiste does not reveal the Ragam of his RTP before
hand. The audience and often, the accompanying musicians find out the Ragam
just when the musician begins to play the RTP.
The first part of the RTP is simply the Alapanai of the Ragam (the word
'Ragam', is also a synonym for Alapanai, remember ?) After the Alapanai, the
singer usually takes a break (and sips 'hot water' or milk kept on the
sidelines) when the violinist takes over and tries to play the same musical
phrases the singer just sang. This calls for a tremendous memory and ear for
musical phrases. Of course, no one keeps tabs on how accurately the violinist
follows the musician. The closer the violinists and the musicians are, the
better. (This probably explains why specific violinist play for specific
musicians because they 'know' each other well)
The second part of the RTP is called Tanam - don't confuse it with TaLam.
Here the Ragam is elaborated even more. But now, the improvisation is in a
faster tempo and set to a rhythm. Syllables such as 'Tum', 'Tanam' etc are used
in this section (as opposed to syllables typically used in Alapanai). The
violinist usually follows the musician after every passage. (unlike in the
Alapanai part where he waited till the musician got done with the whole
Alapanai) If instrumentalists are performing the RTP, in Tanam segment, they would
play the sympathetic strings for added effect.
After the Tanam, the singer then starts on Pallavi, which in the context of
RTP is just one line of text - often made up by the musician himself. He could
very well have chosen 'Baa baa black sheep' as the Pallavi if he can massage
the line to fit the Talam. Here, the Mridangam and Ghatam join in. The musician
would embark on a series of 'Neravals' stretching the one line of Pallavi into
several melodic phrases. The violinist of course follows the musician one step
behind. Interestingly, at this point, the Mridangam would play when the
musician sings and the Ghatam player would play for the violinist. The musician
would cap it all off finally with a spate of Kalpana Swarams, by which time all
the dimensions of the Ragam would have been (hopefully !) brought out.
Then the singer would break into an impromptu Raga Malika - singing Kalpana
Swaram sequences in a bunch of Ragams, one after another. He chooses the Ragams
in the Raga Malika to be widely apart, instead of being only subtely different.
(Often 'light' ragams or Hindustani type Ragams are chosen). If
Shankarabharanam is the Ragam for the RTP, then derivatives of Shankarabharanam
are usually not chosen in the Raga Malika section). At the end of the Kalpana
Swaram passage of each Ragam, he would sing the old Pallavi in that particular
Ragam. The grand finale is when he breaks into a long series of Swarams
(typically in the reverse order of the Raga Malika Ragams) and finally landing
on the initial Ragam he had set out to play - (Shankarabharanam).
At this point, the singer typically lets the percussionists (Ghatam and
Mridangam player) perform solo. This is called Tani Avartam or Tani Avartanam
or Tani. This is also the time when the audience too takes a break and
typically indulges in disruptive behaviour like chatting, rushing home or even
dozing off. The percussionists grab this opportunity to perform the intricate
aspects of the Talam.
A good Ragam, Tanam, Pallavi can last upwards of an hour and it is a vehicle
for showcasing a singer's talent.
A TYPICAL KARNATIC MUSIC CONCERT
One of the dangers on writing about a 'typical' music
concert is that these days there is no clear definition of what is 'typical'.
Only a few years ago, instrument solos were rare in the Karnatic music
tradition. Now, they are all over the place. These days several Karnatic
musicians follow the Hindustani format as well and just sing a Ragam, Tanam,
Pallavi and a few additional pieces. There are of course, numerous other
changes that always keep happening - some trend-setting, some others just
passing fads. Let us however look at a garden variety Karnatic concert.
A typical concert lasts around three hours. And most concerts do not have a
'program' given out ahead of time. By and large, the audience does not know
what song is going to be performed next, even though these days most musicians
have become reasonably Westernized and 'announce' their next song and what
Ragam and Talam they are set in and who composed the song.
The musician would start the concert with a fast paced Varnam. This not only
serves as a warm up piece for the ensemble to synchronize, it also sets the
mood for the concert. And of course, it allows the latecomers in the audience
the time to find their seats and sit down before the heavy-duty songs are sung.
Usually, the singers will also resort to some gimmicks in the Varnam itself -
such as playing the Varnam in several speeds or adding their own Kalpana Swaram
This will then be followed by a song about Vinayaka in the Ragam Hamsadhwani
or Nattai. Given there are only so many songs in Hamsadhwani and Nattai about
Vinayaka, you can almost predict what is coming. Then the singer performs a
variety of songs - choosing them appropriately so that he has the right mix and
order of Ragams, tempo and audience appeal. He would choose to express his
creativity whereever by performing Alapanai or Neraval or Kalpana Swaram at the
appropriate parts of the songs. Then eventually he will perform the Ragam,
After the RTP, the concert winds down and tends to get 'light', where the
musician plays several short, light numbers. Instrumentalists sometimes tune
their instruments to a higher pitch, (That is, intentionally shift their basic
octave higher) to give the concert an artificially bright mood (and also to
wake up the sleeping members of the audience) These light pieces are usually
called 'Tukkadas' (literally meaning 'pieces') They could be popular, recent
numbers or 'trademark' songs of a particular performer or even movie songs.
Many Tukkadas are set in light Ragams or rare ragams and some in Hindustani
Ragams. They could be a Bhajan song, a folk song, song in an obscure language,
a Tillana (which is basically a dance song, often set in high tempo, with a lot
of dance steps set to syllables such as 'teem', 'takka timi', 'thaa thai' etc),
or a Javali (a short, 'quick' composition) Toward the end of the concert,
members of the audience usually request their choices - often honored by the
musicians. Finally, the concert is officially ended by singing a brief number
called 'Mangalam', usually in the Ragam Madhyamavati, but sometimes even in
Ragams like Surati.
A VERY, VERY BRIEF HISTORY OF KARNATIC MUSIC
Like many things Indian, even Indian music has a colorful
history, which can probably give us insights into some of its numerous
traditions and grammatical structure. Indian classical music, as an
institution, has evolved greatly over the years - it is still in the process of
evolution, changing itself at every possible opportunity and adapting itself to
popular sentiment and political climate. Let us take a quick look at the
history of Indian music - of course, it will be a 'quick look' and you can look
in any of the references quoted at the end of this primer for an in-depth
Remember that in ancient India, music played a significantly larger role in
people's lives compared to these modern times. Our ancestors did not listen to
music in their chariot-stereos the way we do these days. Greater percentage of
the population (compared to these days) composed music, performed it and even
did research on it. People dedicated themselves to music. Kings and queens
patronized music and had a full court of accomplished musicians. As Dr.
Baghyalakshmi puts it, "The Kings went to sleep and woke up to
music...". There were music competitions held every once in a while, which
pitted one learned musician against another, where the degree of difficulty was
so high that most of the modern day musicians would not even qualify to enter.
Although these music contests produced outstanding scholarship, they were also
vehicles to heap shame and humiliation on the defeated rival - an aspect which
is hard for me to understand. History is also full of legends and astonishing
individual accomplishments. Very high standards were established. It took a
musician several decades of intense studentship (typically in a Gurukulam)
before he or she could be considered a concert performer. These days after one
summer, kids are already on stage 'performing' music.
Even in the early part of this century, people did not have the modern day
'high stress', 'no time for anything' lifestyle. Concerts lasted all night and
people sat down and 'sustain-listened' to the same Ragam performed for the sixth
continuous hour. These days we get a few minute condensed pop versions of most
Alapanai on CDs and tapes. Well, I am sounding like a bitter cynic, but it
should be borne in mind that the ancient texts on music (and traditional
Karnatic music in general) are way, way more complex than what I have
elaborated. There is almost very little you or I can add to the Indian music
There is a staggering amount of written work on music that exists in India -
right from Vedic times to the present day. A good lot of them are extremely
sophisticated and seminal and boggle the mind on the level of analysis. It is
easy to read just the first paragraph of one of those works and get totally
lost in a buzzword-maze of "Lakshana', 'Beda', 'Grama' and so forth. These
texts on music are about as tough as texts on Indian philosophy and the degree
of abstraction employed can be scary. Remember that we had more than our share
of mathematicians and theoretical people (and software folks !) in India who
not only invented concepts like zero, but also established fascinating
mathematical foundations for music. Not knowing enough sanskrit (or music for
that matter) can only hamper our quest for understanding these texts. Suffice
it to say that there exist elaborate frameworks on which the musical system is
based. Throughout history, famous texts on music were more or less considered
the 'Bibles' and the rules and formulations they spelt out were strictly
conformed to and taught to students.
There is something or the other mentioned about Indian music in a variety of
Indian literature. Even in the Vedic times, elements of music were recognized.
Mantras were chanted using selected notes. Initially, only a few notes were
used, but eventually to relieve the monotony, more notes got added. Sama Veda,
the most musical of the Vedas, is almost 'sung out' even these days. For most
parts, the lower octave was employed (Mandra Stayi, remember ?) Music was
considered divine and was kept in the selected social circles for most parts. The
earliest Ragam is speculated to be 'Sama Ragam', which could be a derivative of
the modern day Kharaharapriya. Theories and treatises began to be written -
about how the primitive sound 'om' gave rise to the notes etc.
By the time the Epic period came around, the ancients were entrenched in the
seven notes used in Indian music as building blocks, namely Sa, Ri, Ga, Ma, Pa,
Dha and Ni. They were considered the 'Saptha Swarams' and explanations were
abound regarding their deeper meaning. About the only thing that was not fixed
was the exact 'frequency' or pitch (in the octave) which was used to produce
each of these notes. Which 'keys' could be used to produce these seven notes ?
The relationship between Sruti (frequency) and Swarams (notes) has been the focus
of several theoretical works on music through the ages.
written by Bharata. This is a monumental reference for the Bharata Natya and
other dance forms, but contains several chapters on music as well. The date of
this work is pegged somewhere between the second century BC to the second
century AD. This is probably the first work which clearly elaborated the octave
and divided it into 22 keys. Bharata based his idea on a stunning scientific
experiment he performed using his musical instrument (made of strings) which
'proved' that there could be only 22 basic frequencies that could be generated
in an octave. He even located them in his octave and thus tuned his string
Not only did Bharata 'invent' the keys in an octave, he also gave some basic
rules to scale building. He defined three major scales with the following
shifts to choose seven keys out of 22:
Scale 1: 4/3/2/4/4/3/2 (This is called Shadja Grama)
Scale 2: 4/3/2/4/3/4/2 (Called Madhyama Grama)
Scale 3: 3/2/4/3/3/4/3 (Called Gandhaara Grama)
Here the word 'Grama' is simply a synonym for a scale. This kind of
algorithm is somewhat similar to the Western Major/Minor algorithms. In
addition to these principal algorithms, he also derived seven secondary
'scales' per algorithm - each of these derived scales was called a 'Moorchana'
(literally meaning 'fainting'). From these Moorchanas, using some other rules,
he derived even more scales which could have less than seven notes (called
'Tanas') which eventually led to what could be called Ragams ! Phyooo ! It
isn't clear whether Bharata used the term 'Ragam' in the sense it is used these
The interesting point is, Bharata's theory has been pretty much the guiding
principle for subsequent musicologists through history. Various theories were
framed to understand the divine and religious nature of the seven notes. There
were theories to assign each note to a body part which produce sounds, like
nose, throat, stomach, head etc. Yet another theory suggested that the sounds
of each note matched those of common animals like Sa for peacock, Ri for ox, Ga
for Goat, Ma for crane, Pa for Cuckoo, Dha for horse and Ni for elephant. All
this might sound very primitive, but believe me, these theories quickly go into
extremely complicated mathematical formulations. Some people have even
suggested formulas to generate millions of Ragams!
The next major work to hit the scene after Bharata's work was Dathilam. The
exact period of this work is not firmly established. Here too, the author
sticks to the 22 sruti per octave formalism and even goes to suggest these 22
srutis are the only ones a human body could make. (This view was expressed
again by another musicologist of the thirteenth century of name Saranga Deva in
his famous work Sangeeta Ratnakara - in fact, Sarang Deva was an expert in
Ayurveda as well and goes on to give an Ayurvedic basis for the 22 sruti
There were other seminal works such as Brahhaddesi (Ninth century AD)
written by Matanga. He probably takes the credit for the emergence of the term
Ragam, although the term had been used by authors before him. Matanga was the
one who explained it and helped 'define' it. Interestingly, around the same
time, the native South Indian music also dealt with terms like 'Pann' and
'Paalai', which can be construed as the South Indian equivalents of 'Ragam'.
Tevaram and Silappadhikaram describe several such 'Ragams' and in fact, we have
already seen that Ilango Adigal, the author of Silappadhikaram has described
the prevailing Tamil algorithms to build scales. (called Ilikkiramam) It is
quite possible that Ilango Adigal and the composers of Tevaram and South
Indians in general were aware of the all pervasive work of Bharata's, 'Natya
Sastra' (Quite a lot of cultural exchanges took place between the South and the
North, contrary to what we would like to believe now). However, these Tamil
classics are major works in their own right and it is a pity that not too much
of this is discussed in the context of history of Indian music, especially due
to the large volume of musical literature in sanskrit.
Sangeeta Makaranda, a book presumed to be written in the eleventh century by
a person called Narada, enumerates 93 Ragams and classifies them into masculine
and feminine species. The next major work on music was Sangeeta Ratnakara
written by Saranga Deva during the thirteenth century. Saranga Deva was a
Kashmiri, but wrote his work while in South India.
It was approximately around this time in history that the South Indian
(Karnatic) music and Hindustani music bifurcated themselves and began to evolve
in two different directions. (Dr. Rangaramanuja Iyengar, suggests the twelfth
century as the cut off point, in an operational sense) Even now, the Dhrupad
music practiced in the North India is somewhat similar in style to the South
Indian Karnatic music. For example, in Dhrupad, they use a percussion
instrument called Pakhwaj, (instead of Tabla) which is similar to the South
Sangeeta Ratnakara was a milestone of sorts. Not only was it a musicology text,
but it also had detailed prescription for the performance. (The grammar and
framework are usually called 'Lakshana' and the actual performance is called
'Lakshaya') We have already seen how he gave an Ayurvedic basis for the 22
sruti octave. He too performed a famous experiment (on a veena) to determine
the 22 srutis uniquely. He also mapped the 22 srutis into seven Swaras. (like
our Table III) and also suggested the 'mood' for the various Swaras (Sa
produces heroism, Ri - terror, Pa - love and so on) He was probably responsible
for suggesting an inter-relationship between the various notes constituting a
Ragam, by proposing the Vaadhi-Samvaadhi-AnuVaadhi-Vivaadhi notion of a Ragam.
A word or two about this since you might hear these terms mentioned. What is
the relationship between the various notes in a Ragam ? How can we understand
how the note 'Sa' is related to the note 'Ma' or 'dha' in that Ragam ? This
scheme defines a concept called the 'Vaadhi' or the primary note of a Ragam or
the sonant or the 'King'. And by the same token, a Samvaadhi or the 'Minister'
or the second in line ('Concordant note'); 'Anuvaadhi' or the 'Servant' to give
the 'proper shape' to the Ragam ('Assonant') and finally the 'Dissonant' or the
Vivaadhi, or the 'enemy'. It is questionable as to how useful such dissection
is; but considerable volumes have been written about such things and several
hundred Ragams and their Vaadhi-Vivaadhi etc structure has been catalogued by
several authors. You must remember that this theory is essentially to analyze
the concept of a Ragam and explain what gives its specific appeal.
Saranga Deva, among other things, defined almost 264 Ragams, including some
Dravidian and North Indian ones. He also described the various 'kinds' of
'microtones' and how to produce them. He also classified them into various
categories. He defined something called 'Kaku' (a term that is hardly used
these days) as a blending of melody and sruti.
More than anything else, after his work came into being, it provided a veritable
guide to the performers. Any standard reference such as Dr. Bhagyalekshmy's or
Dr. RangaRamanuja Iyengar's or Dr. Shringi's book has greater details on
Sangeeta Ratnakara. Saranga Deva's work probably launched a whole new era in
music compositions and performance. In fact, for several centuries afterwards,
the theorization of music became dormant, giving importance to performance. In
the seventeenth century, there was a resurgence of theoretical works - such as
Sangeeta Sudha (written by Govinda Dikshitar) and Chaturdandi Prakasikam (by
Venkatamakhi). The latter expounded the present day Melakarta Scheme. The
author mentions the twelve sruti octave and defines the Melakarta Ragams. At
that time only about 19 (out of 72) were 'known'. He proposed the Katayapadi
scheme of figuring out the keys used in the Melakarta from the name. It is
interesting to point out that the original names given by him for the 72
Melakartas are not the ones used these days. For example, he called the first
Melakarta as Kanakambari whereas it is called Kanakanki at present. In fact,
except for one or two Ragams almost all of the 72 names are quite different
compared to what he had meant - although his names, as well as the present
names follow the Katayapadi scheme outlined in Table V ! It must be remembered
however, that this is not the only way to classify Ragams. There are several
other alternate schemes and names (composers like Muthuswamy Dikshitar used
alternate names for several ragams) and you can get very deeply into such
While such elaborate theoretical works were being written, eminent composers
appeared on the scene and produced music. Annammacharya (1424-1503) a devotee
of the 'Lord of Tirupati' composed several notable pieces. He was followed by
Purandara Dasa (1480-1564).
Purandara Dasa is considered the father of Karnatic music. He was a
multi-millionaire ('koteeswara') to begin with, and accumulated enormous wealth
in business. He was only interested in the pursuit of money and material
pleasures, like most of us, till one day due to a divine intervention, his life
changed one eighty degrees. He renounced his wealth and became a 'Dasa' (which
means a servant) dedicating his life to serving god and making music in god's
honor. From then on, his life was one misery after another and there are
several legends associated with him which make interesting reading. Through all
this Purandara Dasa never stopped making music. He is said to have composed
nearly a quarter million songs in his lifetime, for which he probably earned
quite a lot of 'Frequent Composer Mileage' awards. By the way, this works out
to be about fifteen songs for every single day of his life. Even discounting
for exaggeration, he was quite prolific. Several hundreds of his songs are
still available, although it is likely that many of the present day versions of
his numbers were set to tune by later musicians. His compositions were mostly
in his native tongue, Kannada.
Purandara Dasa's songs are simple and easy for beginners to learn. He was
the one who is credited with standardizing the Mayamalavagoulai Ragam as a
Lesson Number One for beginning students and is said to have even composed the
Sarali Varisai/Jandai Varisai (exercises in 'note' reproduction) for beginners.
The Golden Age of Karnatic music was perhaps the time when the Trinity of
Karnatic composers Thyagaraja (1767-1847), Shyama Sastri (1763-1827) and
Muthuswamy Dikshitar (1775-1835) made music. Interestingly, they were all
contemporaries hailing from the same Thanjavur district, although it is not
clear what kind of influence each had on the other. Their lifestyles, music,
attitudes seem so different that it contributed to their musical styles being
distinct from each other. Volumes and volumes have been written about them. So
what you will find here are truly only the thumbnail sketches.
Thyagaraja is probably hailed as the King of Karnatic music, although when
he was alive he shunned publicity and even rejected the King's invitation to
join his court. In fact, he renounced worldly goods, (including copyrights to
his songs :-)) and devoted himself to God. His songs have the raw devotion
('Bhakti', if you will) and are considered emotional. He composed songs in his
mother tongue, Telugu. It is not known how many songs he has composed, but
nearly a thousand songs are available at present, completely notated and
interpreted. He has also composed operas. From the musicology point of view,
Thyagaraja is credited with the invention of 'Sangatis' and with numerous other
creative ideas in rhythm. Thyagaraja's most famous compositions are the five
Pancharatna Kritis set in the Ragams Nattai, Goulai, Arabhi, Varali and Sree.
Yes, who hasn't heard the song 'Endaro Mahanu bhavulu..' and not liked it ?
Dikshitar was more of an academician of music and a pedagogue. He was quite
a handsome man, which perhaps explains why he had two wives. He spent
considerable time in the North studying Hindustani music, which influenced him
quite a bit. He wrote his songs primarily in sanskrit (I have heard one of his
songs with just one stanza in Tamil). About four hundred or so of his songs
exist at present. His songs are more complex and few can sing some of his
complicated pieces. His lyrics are generally praises of the God (or Goddess) in
point and are much more subdued and formal compared to the raw energy of a
Thyagaraja song. His songs are often slow (influence of Hindustani) and often
went into several different aspects of the Ragam.
Shyama Sastry is the most obscure of the three - he is considered a wizard
of rhythm and composed several pieces called Swarajatis which enunciate various
Interestingly, none of the Trinity's students made it very big. (some of
them became reasonably famous alright) This brings to point the curious
teacher-student relationship that used to exist in India. Karnatic music was
largely an oral tradition. Information was often lost, sometimes forever, when
Gurus passed on their knowledge to their disciples - and this doesn't even
count jealous and selfish Gurus who wouldn't teach everything to the disciples.
It is surprising that the ancient Indians, clever as they were, did not invent
a scheme to notate music.
There are several other notable composers such as Gopala Krishna Bharathi
who composed in Tamil and was a contemporary of the trinity. Prior to him were
other Tamil composers like Arunagiri Nathar and Arunachala Kavi Rayar. Swati
Tirunal, the king of Travancore was a great composer of the nineteenth century.
Among the more recent composers are Papanasam Sivan and Balamurali Krishna and
the list goes on and on. Now we have come to a point in history where not only
has theorizing stopped, but even composing of heavy duty pieces seem to have
stopped and we are left with only performers ! Many of the references I have
cited at the end give a long list of such performers - some real luminaries and
some also-playeds, but most have pompous sounding prefixes like
'Shankarabharanam' Narasayya, 'Todi' Raghava Iyer and 'Mohanam' Somebody.
A more fascinating aspect of history of Karnatic music is to study its
evolution, delineate the broad musical trends etc. For example, even the
instruments used in music-making have changed over the years. Gone are the
olden instruments which were mostly derivatives of Veena. In fact, Veena-making
was a fine art and there were many, many types of Veenas serving various
different purposes. The harp type instrument ('Yazh') and the ancient flutes
have disappeared. Instead Western instruments such as Clarionet, Guitar,
Saxaphone and Mandolin are increasingly being adapted to Karnatic music.
Interestingly, not many newer Hindustani instruments (such as sitar, sarod and
sarangi) are used in Karnatic music.
Another historical accident was the introduction of violin in Karnatic
music. It was popularized in the nineteenth century by Vadivelu, who was a
member of what is considered as the Thanjavur Quartet - a set of four brothers
who were very talented composers/musicians especially of dance music. (They
came a little after the more famous Trinity) Vadivelu was a court musician in
the Travancore Royal Court and made extraordinary contributions to dance music,
besides being a master of violin. By the way, he is said to have accompanied
himself on the violin, a no mean feat ! Like his musically gifted patron,
composer Swati Tirunal, the king of Travancore, he too died when he was in his
It is interesting to note that the violin was embraced very easily by the
Karnatic music tradition whereas it is not so prominent even now in Hindustani
music. Prior to violin, veena used to accompany vocalists. The present day
vocal concert always has violin support, even though the violinist only plays
in the shadow of the vocalist, with very few chances in the concert to show off
his talents. This is quite intriguing to say the least. (Of course, the
violinist can mask the vocalist sometimes and this can actually be a plus point
if the vocalist has a horrible voice!)
For more detailed accounts of the recent history, happenings etc, one should
read a magazine published from Madras called 'Sruti', which not only provides
concert reviews, news events etc, but also gives us a peek into the prevailing
'Karnatic music' taste and culture. However, if you are a history buff, my
strong recommendation will be Rangaramanuja Iyengar's delightful book. He is
fanatical about Karnatic music and gets quite merciless in condemning the
'modern day Karnatic music world' - his modern day being the 1950 s ! I wonder
what he would have to say if he sees people with questionable credentials
writing Karnatic music primers - who even has the temerity to suggest that a
Western electronic keyboard be used as a learning tool!
MANGALAM ! A few final words
While you are trying to get more and more interested in
Karnatic music, you should also perhaps ponder about where Indian classical
music (and Karnatic music in particular) is heading toward, as we enter yet
another millenium. The old generation and conservatives complain about the
total degradation of the standard of Karnatic music these days, the low level
of present day talent and how everything is so hurried and compromised. Oh,
this age of high crime and fast computers and social mores ! Add to this the
relentless onslaught of music from other cultures (notably Hollywood and Europe)
and movie 'pop' songs which completely take over the popular taste. Does
Karnatic classical music, as we know it, even have a chance of survival ?
I think the answer is 'yes' - purely because it has survived and in fact,
flourished the last several thousand years, like many other Indian traditions
and institutions. Part of the reason for this resilience is that the Indian
classical music systems are very adaptive - they change and rejuvenate
themselves. If some of the Western ideas can be incorporated, they will be. Who
knows, several decades from now, concepts like chords, polyphony or
orchestration may be standard in Karnatic music.
The other reason for my optimism is that the Indian institutions always
percolated down to the masses and touched them. I know I am treading
controversial grounds. (Following Dr. RangaRamanuja Iyengar) The Vedas were too
complex for the ordinary people. So its core principles were outlined in
simpler works like the Epics and Puranas. While expert musicians dueled with
each other in Royal courts, the masses sang Bhajan songs without worrying about
any musical intricacies. These days too while concert musicians play to packed
halls in Madras, there is an overabundance of classical music being composed
for the masses - movie songs and Bhajans - which are quite appealing and tend
to 'hook' people to classical music. Composers like Ilayaraja and A.R. Rahman
have composed many, many nice classical pieces which are every bit melodious as
some of the ancient songs, even if they don't meet all the criteria for great
classical compositions. If you take good, classical music directly to people,
you are not going to lose!
We just cannot hang on to our past. We cannot go back to Gurukulam days. We
cannot analyze Sa Ri Ga Ma in terms of horses and elephants. Let us learn more
and adapt ourselves to the new and exciting things in front of us. And let us
enjoy Karnatic music !
(1) Fundamentals of music - Raymond Elliott, Prentice Hall.
(2) Carnatic Music Composers - Edited by Dr. B. Dayananda Rao, The Triveni
(3) History of South Indian (Carnatic) Music - Dr. R. Rangaramanuja
(4) Indian Musicology - Melodic Structure - Mriganka Sekhar Chakraborty,
Firma KLM Private Limited, 1992.
(5) Carnatic Music Compositions - Dr. S. Bhagyalekshmy, CBH Publications,
1994. (Also by the same author, Ragas in Karnatic Music and Lakshanagrandhas in
Music, both published by CBH Publications as well)
(6) Music in Cilappadikaram - Dr. S. Ramanathan, Madurai Kamaraj University,
(7) Karnataka Sangeeta Sastra - Theory of Carnatic Music - A. S.
Panchapakesa Iyer, Ganamrutha Prachuram, 1989.
(8) Sangeeta Ratnakara of Saranga Deva - R. K. Shringy and Dr. Prem Lata
Sharma, Munshi Ram Manoharlal Publications. (Vol I and II), 1991.
APPENDIX I: SOME MELAKARTA RAGAMS AND THEIR DERIVATIVE RAGAMS
(1) Ramnad Krishnan; Vidwan Music of South India by
In this CD, Ramnad Krishnan, a vocalist plays just about four pieces. This
CD has a nice 'jacket' with a lot of notes written by Jon Higgins himself -
they have even outlined the scales of the various Ragams used. See if you can
identify the keys used in various Ragams. Among the Ragams chosen by Krishnan
is Madhyamavati, a famous pentatonic Ragam. See if you can play it on the
keyboard. For several mathematical reasons (the way the keys are arranged in
the octave in specific ratios) this Ragam is supposed to sound unusually
pleasant. See if you can relate to it. Krishnan plays Ragam, Tanam, Pallavi in
Ragam Bhairavi. The CD jacket identifies the various components of RTP, such as
Ragam, Tanam, Neraval, Kalpana Swaram and Tani Avartam. See if you can follow
(2) Irresistible; L. Subramaniam, Violin, Oriental Records
This has a rendition of the very first Geetam anybody learns 'Sri Gana
Naada' in Ragam Malahari. The second piece is a Varnam in Ragam Hamsadhwani in
seven speeds. The Ragam, Tanam, Pallavi is in a Melakarta Ragam Simhendra
(3) Jon B Higgins, Vocal, EMI
The CD starts off with a Varnam in Ragam Bhairavi. See if you can identify
this Ragam from Ramnad Krishnan's RTP in the same Ragam. This CD also has
Thyagaraja's magnum opus 'Endaro Mahanu' in Ragam Sree. Jon Higgins also has
songs in two Melakarta Ragams, Chakravaham and Pantuvarali (Pantuvarali is
officially listed under the name Kamavardhini). He also uses another major
pentatonic Ragam, Hindolam. Find out the notes of Hindolam and play it on the
keyboard. It really sounds very pleasant and upbeat. Also, notice that Jon
Higgins has used a variety of Talams, all the way from Adi to Roopakam to the
(4) Violin Virtuoso, Lalgudi Jayaraman, Violin, Oriental Records
The artiste here starts off with a Varnam in Ragam Valaji and plays a song
in a Melakarta Ragam Nasikabhusani. The Ragam, Tanam, Pallavi is also in the
Ragam Simhendra Madhyamam. Can you compare this with the RTP played by L.
Subramaniam in the same Ragam ?
(5) U. Srinivas, Mandolin, Realworld
The Ragam, Tanam, Pallavi here is in Ragam Keeravani, a Melakarta. This
Ragam differs from Ragam Simhendra Madhyamam only by the note Ma. (These two
Ragams are 36 apart in the Melakarta sequence) Pay careful attention to the Ragamalikai
section, in the RTP. There is also a song in another Melakarta Ganamurthy.